Use of eddy current inspection for airworthiness directive AD/PZL/5
Date issue released
Safety Issue Description

The eddy current inspection used on VH-TZJ, and other M18 aircraft, had not been approved by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority as an alternate means of compliance to airworthiness directive AD/PZL/5. This exposed those aircraft to an inspection method that was potentially ineffective at detecting cracks in the wing attachment fittings.

Issue number
AO-2013-187-SI-03
Transport Function
Aviation: General aviation
Issue Owner
Aviation NDT Services Pty Ltd
Mode of Transport
Aviation
Issue Status Justification

The ATSB is satisfied that the actions taken by CASA address the safety risk associated with this issue.

Proactive action
Action number
AO-2013-187-NSA-050
Organisation
Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Action date
Action Status
Closed
Action description

On 15 November 2013, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) issued an amendment to airworthiness directive AD/PZL/5, revoking the approval for the eddy current procedure to be used for M18 wing joint inspections. It also added a 100‑hourly visual inspection, and additional wing-off inspections in M18 aircraft every 2,500 hours. CASA also issued a direction to all registered operators of M18 aircraft in Australia that the aircraft could be flown after compliance with the amended AD.

On 22 November 2013, CASA issued AD/PZL/5 Amendment 2, to additionally require:

  • completion of magnetic particle inspections on M18 aircraft with less than 2,500 hours’ time in service
  • allow the use of CASA-approved alternative magnetic particle inspection methods
  • reduce the complexity of the AD
  • make corrections to reference documents.