The Bureau has considered your response to the above
recommendation, dated 6 April 2000, and is of the opinion that
regulatory guidance for the separation of such aircraft is
warranted. As such, the ATSB has classified the response as - OPEN.
Your response indicates that although CASA is of the opinion that
it would not be feasible to achieve a practical, enforceable regime
of separation assurance, CASA would be prepared to consider further
discussions with Airservices Australia and AMSA on the issue.
Search plans often require aircraft to manoeuvre at a common
boundary. As the limitations of the "see and avoid" principle in
marginal VMC are often paramount in the minds of search organisers,
they construct plans that give some form of vertical separation as
a safety buffer. These buffers are based on their own experience
and there are no regulations to give authority for such
decisions.
The CASA position indicates that separation rules applicable to the
airspace involved are adequate. However, in controlled airspace,
this could mean that aircraft are conducting a search at 2,500 ft
above the surface, a height that could severely limit the chances
of spotting survivors.
In certain search situations, the ability of pilots to maintain an
adequate lookout is limited and if they revert to full IFR
separation procedures, the ability of the observers to locate a
target is again diminished.
If AusSAR were to produce a search plan which did not provide
formal IFR separation in circumstances where it was otherwise
warranted, then litigation resulting from an accident would be a
distinct possibility.
The Bureau considers that a working group consisting of appropriate
representatives of CASA, AusSAR and Airservices Australia should
look at the standards to be used in various search scenarios.
The ATSB therefore suggests that CASA review its earlier
decision.