No regulatory requirement for simulator training in Australia
No regulatory requirement for simulator training in Australia
Output Number
Approval Date
Organisation
Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Published Date Time
Recommendation type
Status
Mode
Date released

Safety issue

There was no regulatory requirement for simulator training in
Australia.

Action taken by the Civil Aviation Safety
Authority

A summary of CASA activities to facilitate the use of full
flight simulators and/or flight training devices follows:

The following inter-related activities are in the process of
implementation:

  • A combined workshop activity with Ansett Aviation Training,
    Capiteq Limited trading as AirNorth, Network Aviation Pty Ltd,
    Skippers Aviation Pty Ltd, PelAir Aviation Pty Ltd and CASA was
    held on 27, 28 April 2009.
  • CASA has initiated a review of CAR 217 Training Organisations
    and Training Centres. This programme of review was prompted
    following investigations that revealed AOC holder training
    inconsistencies.
  • A Component of the 'CAR 217 Training Organisations and Training
    Centres Special Emphasis Review' is to establish the level of
    company oversight and involvement with training and simulation,
    programmes that have been outsourced.
  • Civil Aviation Order 40.2.1 - Instrument Rating, Section 12A,
    `Renewal using an overseas flight simulator training provider' has
    been added to include the option of instrument proficiency checks
    being conducted by an overseas simulator provider. This is to
    enable an instrument rating renewal where a specific type simulator
    is not available in Australia:

    • This amendment needs to read in conjunction with Advisory
      Circular AC 60-2 (1) of May 2007;
    • The Advisory Circular identifies that CASA recognises the
      flight simulator qualifications certificates issued by Canada, Hong
      Kong (Special Administrative Region of China), New Zealand, the
      United States of America, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark,
      Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway,
      Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom;
      and
    • Civil Aviation Order 40.1.0 - Aircraft Endorsement -
      Aeroplanes, Section 6. This facilitates an option for instrument
      rating renewals to be associated with the issue of an aircraft type
      rating.

ATSB assessment of response/action

The activities undertaken by CASA appear to have facilitated
increased use of simulators for endorsement and other training.
However, the ATSB remains concerned that there is no regulatory
requirement for simulator training when a suitable simulator is
available in Australia.

Safety Recommendation

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau recommends that the Civil
Aviation Safety Authority address this safety issue.

Organisation Response
Date Received
Organisation
Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA)
Response Text

CASA will address this issue and will commence a review of the
legislation. In the course of that review, CASA will consider
whether there is a need to mandate the use of simulators in
connection with certain flight crew training requirements in the
air transport sector, and other sectors where this may be
appropriate.



This work will commence immediately.  It will involve
consultation with industry and may come to involve a risk
assessment, a cost-benefit analysis, and the preparation of a
regulatory impact statement.  As this is likely to be a
protracted process, CASA is not in a position to specify a specific
completion date at this time.

ATSB Response date
Date Received
Organisation
Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA)
Response Text

CASA released a Discussion Paper (DP) in December 2009 on the
subject of mandatory flight simulator training. The DP put forward
a range of options to canvas the views of industry participants.
Responses to this DP closed in February 2010. Numerous responses
were received from a variety of organisations and individuals
including airlines, pilots and flight simulator training providers.
These responses are currently being reviewed and policy proposals
are being developed.

The subject of mandatory flight simulator training is a high
priority for CASA and as such it is expected that a Notice of
Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) will be published in the 2nd quarter of
2010. This NPRM will put forward CASA's proposed policy on this
issue which will in part be derived from the comments received on
the DP. Depending on the results of an assessment of business
compliance costs, the proposal may be subject to a formal
Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) which may prolong the rule making
process.

ATSB Response date
Date Received
Organisation
Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA)
Response Text

On 26 October 2010, CASA issued Notice of Proposed Rule Making -
NPRM 1007OS 'Mandatory Flight Simulator Training - Proposed
amendments to Civil Aviation Orders (CAOs) 40.0 and 82.0' for
industry comment by 21 January 2011.

Date Received
Organisation
Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA)
Response Text

On 8 July 2011, CASA advised that:

The Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) published in October
2010 proposed that pilots must be trained in certain abnormal
aircraft manoeuvres in simulators, if available, rather than in
aircraft. In general terms, for aircraft certificated for 20 or
more passengers, or weighing more than 8618 kg, the NPRM proposed
that pilot training be provided in simulators, if available in
Australia or in a recognised country overseas. For multi-engine
aircraft certificated for between 10 and 19 passenger seats, the
training would have to be conducted in a simulator, if available in
Australia. If a simulator was not available in Australia but was
available overseas, the operator's check pilots would have to
travel overseas for the training.

CASA has assessed the comments received to NPRM 10070S and has
developed a revised proposal taking into account some of the
identified issues. A cost and impact assessment of this proposal is
currently being undertaken. It is anticipated that the revised
proposal, with a cost assessment, will be provided to the joint
CASA/industry Standards Consultative Committee for further
consultation.

Date Received
Organisation
Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Response Text

On 21 May 2012, CASA published a notice of final ruling making
that set out comments made by the aviation industry on the 2010
proposals, as well as the final rules. CASA advised that the
changes to the simulator-based training requirements will come into
effect on 1 April 2013 and encouraged air operators to prepare
early for the new rules.

In June 2012, CASA announced that the new requirements for the
conduct of a range of pilot training and checking exercises in
simulators would reduce the risk of aircraft training accidents,
improve pilot training and lower aircraft wear and tear. CASA
reached this conclusion after analysing the impact of changes to
the Civil Aviation Orders in relation to mandatory simulator
training.

ATSB Response

ATSB assessment of safety action

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau is satisfied that the action
proposed by CASA will adequately address this safety issue.

ATSB Response date