Boeing Co 747 , CCA174

As a result of this occurrence, the Bureau of Air Safety Investigation is investigating a perceived safety deficiency relating to the use of non-standard language by air traffic controllers during communications with flight crew from a non-English speaking background.

Any recommendation issued as a result of this deficiency investigation will be published in the Bureau's Quarterly Safety Deficiency Report.

The instructions passed to the pilot of the B747 may have been unnecessarily complex, given that the pilot was from a non-English speaking background. The controller's transmission was not as definitive as it could have been and included extraneous, non-standard phraseology.

The response from the crew may have indicated to the controller that his transmission was not understood, in that the word "into" indicated a possible turn to intercept the localiser. In addition, the controller did not query the unintelligible transmission.

The Boeing 747 (B747) was on descent for an arrival at Sydney.
The crew was being radar vectored to runway 16R for sequencing
behind a SAAB 340 that was being radar vectored to runway 16L.
Procedures at Sydney had different air traffic controllers
responsible for directing the traffic to each of the parallel
runways. The Director West controller positioned aircraft on final
for runway 16R and the Director East for runway 16L.

The Director West controller was sequencing the B747 and
assigned a heading of 060 degrees magnetic with an instruction to
report when the crew had the field in sight.

The crew of the B747 reported the field in sight and the
Director West controller told the crew to expect to go right up to
the localiser, with a right turn to intercept from the eastern
side. The crew acknowledged with a partly unintelligible
transmission that included the words "roger" (unintelligible)
"localiser into".

Almost immediately, the crew of the B747 turned their aircraft
away from the assigned heading onto a heading of 110 degrees to
intercept the runway 16R localiser. They advised air traffic
control that they were now right heading 110. This particular
heading placed the aircraft in potential conflict with the SAAB.
The Director West controller instructed the crew of the B747 to
maintain a heading of 060 degrees to ensure that the aircraft
passed behind the SAAB. The Director East controller passed traffic
information regarding the B747 to the crew of the SAAB.

Although the crew of the SAAB reported that they had the B747
sighted, radar separation between the two aircraft was reduced to
2.5 NM during the manoeuvre. The separation standard required was
either 3 NM horizontally or 1,000 ft vertically. Analysis of the
radar data indicated that vertical separation between the two
aircraft was reduced to approximately 800 ft when the 3-NM radar
separation standard was infringed.