Recommendations and Safety Advisory Notices
Central to ATSB's investigations of accidents and incidents is
the early identification of safety deficiencies. While the ATSB
issues recommendations to regulatory authorities, operators,
manufacturers or other agencies in order to address safety
deficiencies, its preference is for industry to make safety
enhancements during the course of an investigation. The ATSB is
pleased to report positive safety action in its final reports
instead of needing to make formal recommendations. Recommendations
may be issued in conjunction with ATSB reports or independently. A
safety deficiency may lead to a number of similar recommendations,
each issued to a different agency.
The ATSB does not have the resources to carry out a full
cost-benefit analysis of every recommendation. The cost of any
recommendation must always be balanced against its benefits to
safety. Safety involves the whole community. Such analysis is a
matter for the body to which the recommendation is addressed in
consultation with the industry.
Search Criteria
Mode: Marine
| MO-2009-008-SAN-012 |
| 15 June 2010 |
| Released |
|
Why this Safety Advisory Notice was developed
|
|
Significant safety issue
While most flag States have laws in place that implement the
UNCLOS requirement for a ship's master to render assistance to the
crew of another vessel
following a collision, these laws are not being effectively
implemented on board all ships.
Safety advisory notice
The Australian Transport Safety Bureau advises that all flag
States should consider the safety implications of this safety issue
and take action where considered appropriate.
|
| MO-2009-008-SAN-014 |
| 15 June 2010 |
| Released |
|
Why this Safety Advisory Notice was developed
|
|
Minor safety issue
The evidence suggests that Class B AIS transmissions may not be
reliably detected by watch keepers on board all ships. Therefore,
operators of small vessels fitted with Class B AIS units should be
aware that they cannot rely on the AIS unit alone to warn ships of
their presence.
Safety advisory notice
The Australian Transport Safety Bureau advises that all owners,
operators and skippers of small vessels should consider the safety
implications of this safety issue and take action where considered
appropriate.
|
| MO-2008-011-SAN-042 |
| 14 April 2010 |
| Released |
|
Why this Safety Advisory Notice was developed
|
|
Safety issue
The ship's safety management system working aloft procedure was
not effectively implemented on board the ship and was not routinely
followed when crew members climbed the emergency ladder to assist
with the stowage of the cargo crane hook.
ATSB Safety advisory notice
The Australian Transport Safety Bureau advises that ASP Ship
Management should consider the safety implications of this safety
issue and take action where considered appropriate.
|
| MO-2008-011-SAN-045 |
| 14 April 2010 |
| Released |
|
Why this Safety Advisory Notice was developed
|
|
Safety Issue
The ship's health, safety, security and environment meetings and
job hazard opportunity log were not effectively used to raise and
discuss safety issues associated with cargo crane operations.
ATSB Safety advisory notice
The Australian Transport Safety Bureau advises that ASP Ship
Management should consider the safety implications of this safety
issue and take action where considered appropriate.
|
| MO-2008-011-SAN-019 |
| 14 April 2010 |
| Released |
|
Why this Safety Advisory Notice was developed
|
|
Safety issue
The design of the cradle for the cargo crane hook did not allow
for unassisted stowage of the hook when the ship had a stern trim
in excess of 2.1 m.
ATSB safety advisory notice
The Australian Transport Safety Bureau advises that Marlow
Navigation should consider the safety implications of this safety
issue and take action where considered appropriate.
|
| MO-2008-003-SAN-047 |
| 09 April 2010 |
| Released |
|
Why this Safety Advisory Notice was developed
|
|
Safety issue
The International Safety Management (ISM) Code requires ship
owners to ensure that each ship's master is given all necessary
support to fulfil their duties. However, Jevkon Oil and Gas did not
provide the necessary support either before the commencement of the
delivery voyage or after the ship's crew began having difficulties
using the intermediate fuel oil in the main engine and started
drifting in the Indian Ocean.
ATSB safety advisory notice
The ATSB advises that Jevkon Oil and Gas should consider the
implications of this safety issue and take action where considered
appropriate.
|
| MO-2008-003-SAN-048 |
| 09 April 2010 |
| Released |
|
Why this Safety Advisory Notice was developed
|
|
Safety issue
The ship's safety management system was inadequate. Had Jevkon
Oil and Gas implemented an effective safety management system on
board Breakthrough, the risk of an incident such as the
one that occurred on the delivery voyage would have been
reduced.
ATSB safety advisory notice
The ATSB advises that Jevkon Oil and Gas should consider the
implications of this safety issue and take action where considered
appropriate.
|
| MO-2008-003-SR-049 |
| 09 April 2010 |
| Released |
|
Why this Recommendation was developed
|
|
Safety issue
The ship's certification was issued by a management company to
itself on behalf of the Republic of Sierra Leone, solely with the
purpose of allowing the ship to sail on an international voyage and
did not represent the ship's actual management or that any
effective inspections of the ship or audits of the ship's safety
management system had taken place.
ATSB safety recommendation
The ATSB recommends that the Sierra Leone International Ship
Registry should address this safety issue.
|
| MO-2008-003-SAN-050 |
| 09 April 2010 |
| Released |
|
Why this Safety Advisory Notice was developed
|
|
Safety issue
The operation of the ship's systems and the decisions made by
the ship's senior officers suggests that they did not have
sufficient relevant knowledge and experience to safely undertake
Breakthrough's delivery voyage and they did not
effectively use the time spent in China, standing by the ship, to
acquire the necessary knowledge.
ATSB safety advisory notice
The Australian Transport Safety Bureau advises ship owners,
operators and masters should consider the safety implications of
this safety issue and take action where considered appropriate.
|
| MO-2009-004-SR-008 |
| 16 December 2009 |
| Closed - Partial Action |
|
Why this Recommendation was developed
|
|
Safety Issue
Both the 6 hours on/6 hours off work routine for watchkeepers
and the modified work routine for deck ratings used on board
Thor Gitta, while
complying with the ILO 180 and STCW requirements for rest,
probably resulted in a cumulative level of fatigue in the crew.
Response from the Danish Maritime Authority
The Danish Maritime Authority recognises the use of programs
like FAID to indicate the possibility of fatigue, but regards the
indications given by such programs only as normative and not as
given proof.
It is the opinion of the Danish Maritime Authority that the 6
hours on/off work routine for watchkeepers and the modified routine
for deck ratings on board Thor Gitta does not constitute a
problem as long as the hours of rest are in compliance with the
Order, ILO Convention 180 and part A, Chapter VIII of the STCW code
for crewmembers engaged in watchkeeping.
The Danish Maritime Authority disagrees with the statements
indicating that the roster of the AB and the work routine for
watchkeepers probably results in a cumulative level of fatigue in
the crew.
Safety recommendation
The Australian Transport Safety Bureau recommends that the
Danish Maritime Authority undertake further work to address this
safety issue.
|
|
The DMA has, in 2008, established a procedure on
examination of rest and work hours, as well as outlook whenever a
Danish or Greenlandic ship is involved in grounding or collision or
has a very serious accident.
In these cases, the Investigation Division gather relevant
information and evaluate the information before forwarding them to
various departments within the DMA for further consideration. The
considerations focus on whether there have been violations of rules
in force. Consideration is also focusing on questions in relation
to the manning of ships and possible need of changes.
|
| MO-2008-010-SAN-041 |
| 22 October 2009 |
| Closed |
|
Why this Safety Advisory Notice was developed
|
|
Safety Issue
Saldanha's master and crew were not aware of the
appropriate first aid treatment required for burn injuries. As a
result, the third engineer was not immediately provided with
appropriate first aid.
Safety Advisory Notice
The ATSB advises that flag States, owners, operators and masters
should consider the safety implications of this safety issue and
take action where considered appropriate.
|
| MO-2008-010-SR-039 |
| 22 October 2009 |
| Closed - Action Taken |
|
Why this Recommendation was developed
|
|
Safety Issue
While the Volcano Company safety bulletin warned of the dangers
associated with servicing the VJ type burner, it did not inform
operators that the burner could be replaced with a VJP burner (a
similar burner fitted with a diesel pilot burner), or recommend
that existing oil firing units could be modified.
Safety Recommendation
The ATSB recommends that the Volcano Company takes safety action
to address this safety issue.
Safety Action
The Volcano Company has advised the ATSB that they
will;
1. Advise all operators of the occurrence on board the bulk
carrier Saldanha.
2. Advise all operators of the importance of adhering to the
safety bulletin, regardless of the type of burner, and the fact
that if the operation and servicing are not done as per our safety
bulletin, ship crews will be exposed to the same risks as those
seen on board Saldanha.
3. Advise all operators that the "VJ" burner is a direct
ignition type and that there is also another type of burner "VJP"
fitted with pilot burner. If operators wish to have their burner
fitted with a pilot burner, Volcano will advise them that the
existing burner could be replaced with VJP type burner or that it
can be modified.
4. We will also put the same advice on our homepage for a period
of time.
|
| MO-2008-008-SAN-025 |
| 13 October 2009 |
| Closed |
|
Why this Safety Advisory Notice was developed
|
|
Safety issue
Iron King's safety management system did not include
procedures that adequately ensured that the ship's master and crew
were aware of, and drilled in, the emergency steering system change
over procedure to be followed in the event of steering control
loss.
Safety Advisory Notice
The Australian Transport Safety Bureau advises that owners,
operators and masters should consider the safety implications of
this safety issue and take action where considered appropriate.
|
| MO-2008-009-SR-020 |
| 29 September 2009 |
| Closed - Action Taken - The company has revised its ballast water and work permit procedures and has advised ship's crews of these changes. The company also intends to measure the implementation of these procedures through on board inspections and audits. |
|
Why this Recommendation was developed
|
|
Safety Issue
The work permit system had not been effectively implemented on
board the ship. Consequently, most maintenance and repair work was
being carried out by ship's personnel without the work permits and
'Danger: Do Not Operate' tags that were required by the ship's
procedures.
Safety Recommendation
ATSB recommends that the Parakou Shipping undertake further
action to address this safety issue.
|
| MO-2008-001-SAN-027 |
| 03 June 2009 |
| Closed |
|
Why this Safety Advisory Notice was developed
|
|
Safety Issue
Northern Fortune's third mate did not contact Allena or
take any steps to determine if a collision had occurred and did not
inform the ship's master of the incident. Therefore, he disregarded
his legal and moral obligations to ensure the safety of the fishing
vessel's crew. It is a requirement for flag States to ensure that
their ships' masters effectively implement the United Nations
Convention of the Laws of the Sea (UNCLOS) requirements to stop and
render assistance to those who are in danger of being lost at
sea.
Safety Advisory Notice
The Australian Transport Safety Bureau advises that ship
operators, ship masters and maritime training institutions should
consider the safety implications of this safety issue and to take
action where considered appropriate.
|
| Closed - Accepted |
|
The review of the draft report evoked affirmative opinions
related to the identified safety factor... The ADOMS IID flag State
Chief Casualty Investigator intends to focus attention on the
identified safety factor related to article 98 of UNCLOS. He will
adequately address this issue to raise awareness and to initiate a
brought discussion within the Administration and on all her ships
and on the Marine Accident Investigator's International Forum
(MAIIF) as well. However, it appears to be of paramount importance
as well, that fishing companies and skippers, who operate their
small fishing vessels in confined waters with busy commercial
traffic, understand that safety may also be a two-way road. It can
be a lethal attitude to only rely on the help of others. Fishing
industry and coastal authorities within their territorial limits
are invited to enforce a proactive safety culture including a
professional understanding and adherence of the COLREGS by means of
elevated surveillance and advanced relevant legal
considerations.
|
| MO-2008-001-SAN-029 |
| 03 June 2009 |
| Closed |
|
Why this Safety Advisory Notice was developed
|
|
Safety issue
It was not a requirement for Allena to be fitted with
either a radar reflector or an Automatic Identification System
(AIS) unit. Consequently, the vessel was probably difficult to
detect electronically in the prevailing weather conditions.
Safety Advisory Notice
The Australian Transport Safety Bureau advises that fishing
vessel owners, operators and skippers should consider the safety
implications of this safety issue and takes action where considered
appropriate.
|
| MO-2008-001-SR-028 |
| 03 June 2009 |
| Closed - No Action |
|
Why this Recommendation was developed
|
|
Safety issue
The Queensland regulations for fishing vessel certificates of
competency are ambiguous and are not consistent with the Uniform
Shipping Laws Code (USL Code) or the National Standard for
Commercial Vessels (NSCV). The regulations allow a fishing vessel
to be operated up to 200 miles from the coast by a skipper who may
not have been appropriately trained, experienced or qualified for
that operational area.
Safety Recommendation
The Australian Transport Safety Bureau recommends that Maritime
Safety Queensland takes action to address this safety issue.
|
| MO-2008-007-SR-023 |
| 21 May 2009 |
| Closed |
|
Why this Recommendation was developed
|
|
Safety Issue
Atlantic Eagle's safety management system procedures
for navigation, aimed at ensuring the ships safe progress and
safeguarding against single person errors, had not been effectively
implemented on board the ship and were not followed on 15 July
2008.
Safety Recommendation
The Australian Transport Safety Bureau recommends that Atlantic
Bulk Carriers Management takes safety action to address this safety
issue.
|
| MO-2008-007-SR-024 |
| 21 May 2009 |
| Closed |
|
Why this Recommendation was developed
|
|
Safety Issue
Atlantic Eagle's safety management system procedures
for record keeping had not been effectively implemented on board
the ship, were not followed with regard to the grounding and its
aftermath and no attempt was made by the ships managers to correct
the situation.
Safety Recommendation
The Australian Transport Safety Bureau recommends that Atlantic
Bulk Carriers Management takes safety action to address this safety
issue.
|
| MO-2008-006-SR-021 |
| 20 May 2009 |
| Released |
|
Why this Recommendation was developed
|
|
Safety issue
The ship's safety management system provided no guidance to the
master or crew regarding the minimum level of bridge manning during
periods of pilotage.
Action taken by Reederei Alnwick Harmstorf
MO-2008-006-NSA-017
Reederei Alnwick Harmstorf has advised the Australian Transport
Safety Bureau that consideration will be given to addressing this
safety issue.
Safety Recommendation
The Australian Transport Safety Bureau recommends that Reederei
Alnwick Harmstorf takes action to address this safety issue.
|