At 1500:51 Eastern Daylight-saving Time on 8 October 2011, a
breakdown of separation (BOS) occurred 59 km north-east of
Armidale, New South Wales between a Boeing Company 737-8FE (737),
registered VH-YVA, and a Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation
Gulfstream IV (G-IV), registered VH-CGF.
Both aircraft were under radar surveillance and subject to an
air traffic control (ATC) service. The aircraft were on reciprocal
tracks on air routes that intersected about 35 NM (65 km)
north-east of Armidale.
The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) established that
the controller's mental model for separation correctly identified
the situation and included a plan to manage the traffic. However,
the instructions that were issued to the pilot of the G-IV
contradicted that mental model in that the controller cleared the
G-IV for descent through and below the level being maintained by
the 737. The progression towards the BOS continued when the
controller did not recognise the error during the G-IV pilot's
read-back of the clearance.
Ultimately, the controller's earlier correct level input into
The Australian Advanced Air Traffic System allowed a system
alerting function to activate. In response to that alert, the
controller initiated compromised separation recovery actions to
recover the required separation standard.
The ATSB identified a number of human factors and individual
work processes that contributed to the occurrence. In addition, a
safety issue was identified in respect of differences in the
traffic alert phraseology between the Manual of Air Traffic
Services and Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP). These
differences increased the risk of non-standard advice being
provided to pilots by controllers during compromised separation
recoveries.
In response to this safety issue, Airservices Australia
(Airservices) amended the AIP to enhance understanding of the
criticality of any safety alerts and avoiding actions being
provided to flight crew. This amendment came into effect on 28 June
12.